Joseph Finnerty
Universitair docent
- Naam
- Dr. J.C. Finnerty LLM LLB
- Telefoon
- 071 5272727
- j.c.finnerty@law.leidenuniv.nl
- ORCID iD
- 0000-0002-5142-153X
Voor meer informatie: zie de Engelstalige profielpagina van Joseph Finnerty
Universitair docent
- Faculteit der Rechtsgeleerdheid
- Publiekrecht
- Europees recht
- Europees recht sectie A
- Çalı B. & Finnerty J. (2026), Quality of Law. In: Kushtrim I., Zane R. & Krešimir K. (red.), The Companion to the European Convention on Human Rights. Leiden: Brill | Nijhoff.
- Çalı B. & Finnerty J. (2026), Accessibility of Law. In: Istrefi K., Ratniece Z. & Kamber K. (red.), The Companion to the European Convention on Human Rights. Leiden: Brill | Nijhoff.
- Çalı B. & Finnerty J. (2026), Foreseeability of Law. In: Istrefi K. Ratniece Z. & Kamber K. (red.), Companion to the European Convention on Human Rights. Leiden: Brill | Nijhoff.
- Çalı B. & Finnerty J. (2026), Legitimate Aim. In: Istrefi K., Ratniece Z. & Kamber K. (red.), Companion to the European Convention on Human Rights. Leiden: Brill | Nijhoff.
- Finnerty J.C. & Çalı B. (2026), Legitimate aims and ulterior purposes in human rights law: opening up a comparative research agenda, Human Rights Law Review 26(1): ngaf049.
- Finnerty J.C. & Carler A.U. (2026), Hidden, indirect and ulterior purpose review by regional human rights courts: comparing the cases against Azerbaijan and Venezuela, Human Rights Law Review 26(1): ngaf048.
- Finnerty J.C. & Çalı B (2025), The travaux préparatoires and progressive treaty interpretation: Article 18 of the European Convention on Human Rights, European journal of international law 36(2): 475-499.
- Búrca G. de, Feisel F.M., Finnerty J.C., Kocemba K.A. & Piep J. (2025), Submission to UN Call for input - Draft General Comment No. 38 on Article 22 (Freedom of Association) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: on the illiberal and anti-democratic abuse of freedom of association to restrict and undermine the rights of others. [overig].
- Finnerty J.C. (2024), How should the European Court of Human Rights remedy violations of Article 18 ECHR?: The case for remedial realignment, European Convention on Human Rights Law Review 5(3): 380-399.
- Çalı B., Finnerty J.C., Freeman L., Koenig A., McAvoy L., McDermott Rees Y., Murray D., Sadler-Forster J., Vazquez Llorente R. & Zarmsky S. (2024), Evaluating digital open source imagery: a guide for judges and fact-finders. Swansea: TRUE project. [overig].
- Finnerty J.C. (2023), When is a state’s ‘hidden agenda’ proven?: The role of the Merabishvili’s three-legged evidentiary test in the Article 18 Strasbourg case law, European Convention on Human Rights Law Review 4(4): 447-472.
- Finnerty J.C., annotatie bij: United Nations [UN]; Human Rights Committee [CCPR] 12 maart 2020, nr. UN Doc CCPR/C/128/D/2367/2014. IHRL 2023 (IHRL 3990 Bryukhanov v Russian Federation, Admissibility and merits).
- Finnerty J.C. (23 november 2022), Juszczyszyn v. Poland: article 18 ECHR’s conservative contribution to the Polish rule of law crisis. Strasbourg observers. [blog].
- Finnerty J.C., annotatie bij: United Nations [UN]; Committee Against Torture [CAT] 25 november 2019, nr. UN Doc CAT/C/68/D/817/2017. IHRL 2022 (IHRL 3949 Aarrass v Morocco, Admissibility and merits).
- Finnerty J.C. (2 november 2021), Carter v. Russia: evidentiary solace before the European court of human rights?. Strasbourg observers. [blog].