The Go/No-Go procedure marks an important checkpoint early in the PhD track. It is designed to help ensure that PhD candidates are on a realistic path toward completing a high-quality dissertation in a timely manner. The meeting provides an opportunity to review progress, discuss planning, and receive constructive feedback from your supervisory team and an independent assessor.
Although the Go/No-Go meeting is a formal part of the PhD track, its outcome should not come as a surprise to the candidate. Any concerns about progress are expected to have been addressed in prior discussions between the candidate and the supervisor(s).

For internal PhD candidates, the Go/No-Go meeting takes place no later than 9 months after the start of the appointment, in line with employment law. For external PhD candidates and PhD Fellows, the meeting can be held up to 18 months after the start of the PhD track.

The candidate prepares the written prospectus in close consultation with the supervisor(s), outlining the research questions, theoretical framework, methodology, and a work schedule. This prospectus, together with an updated Training and Supervision Plan (TSP), a preliminary Data Management Plan, and proof of admission to the Graduate School, is submitted to the evaluation committee in advance of the meeting. The committee consists of the supervisor(s), an independent assessor, and the relevant PhD Dean.

While most candidates receive a ‘Go’ and continue their research, a ‘No-Go’ decision may be given in exceptional cases — for example, if there is insufficient progress or if expectations have not been met. In such cases, the PhD track at FGGA cannot be continued. However, the Go/No-Go meeting should be seen first and foremost as a constructive checkpoint and a chance to look ahead.

For full details, please consult the official Go/No-Go Guidelines [PDF link] carefully. If you have any questions about the procedure, PhD candidates and (co-)supervisors are welcome to contact the Graduate School Office.