Leiden University logo.

nl en

Blog Post | Is UN Celebrity Diplomacy in China Effective?

In this blog post Saskia Postema and Jan Melissen claim that Chinese UN celebrities’ activism under Xi Jinping has become aligned with the Chinese leadership’s ambitions.

There is growing concern about China’s influence in the UN system. More than 25 per cent of UN agencies are led by Chinese representatives. Beijing’s increasing activism in the organization is raising foreign eyebrows at a time of increasing Chinese geopolitical maneuvering. However, the UN is also visible in China. Crucial in the UN’s public diplomacy effort are around 30 Chinese celebrities. These informal UN goodwill ambassadors engage online with the public on behalf of the world organization. In International Affairs, we analyse how nine Chinese UN celebrity ambassadors with a total of over 400 million followers communicate online, what this means for our understanding of celebrity diplomacy as a global phenomenon, and who benefits of their outreach.

Weibo is perhaps China’s most heavily censored social media platform. In the rapidly shrinking public sphere under Xi Jinping, any prior opportunities for goodwill ambassadors to discuss work towards the achievement of the UN Sustainable Development Goals within China have all but evaporated. How, therefore, should we make sense of celebrity diplomacy with Chinese characteristics?

Informal diplomats without agency

China’s celebrities are operating in a political and cultural environment in which they navigate the expectations of multiple parties. First, there is the UN as the accrediting international organization, whose strategies and policies are geared towards the propagation of universal values. Second, there is China’s government, which has an overriding interest in using Chinese stars to promote nationalist narratives and offers little scope for deviant messaging in China’s infosphere. Third, there are Chinese societal expectations of national heroes, which lead to the wider public in China casting ‘their’ celebrities as moral role models. Moreover, China’s celebrities do of course have their own personal business interests.

Public and above all political expectations are key variables in shaping China’s celebrity culture. In the West, celebrities are considered to have independent agency, and are seen as outsiders that enter the political sphere to encourage participation and engagement in informal political processes. Quite the opposite is happening in China. Indeed, it is doubtful whether Chinese celebrities benefit from any form of enhanced agency because of their informal diplomatic activity.

The generation gap

More than anything, China’s celebrities are aware of their leadership’s expectations that they display vigorous patriotism in their messaging. Hong Kong actor Jackie Chan is a case in point. In 2018 he tweeted: ‘I am proud that I come from China, a place to entrust in my heart. There is a motherland behind me wherever I go… After the Reunification, I can say I am Chinese wherever I go’. Chinese celebrities perfectly understand the importance of collective norms and expectations regarding their behaviour. They realize that active endorsement of their home government’s policies will massively boost their careers in China’s highly competitive entertainment industry. If transnational mobilizing power is the hallmark of celebrity diplomacy, are the UN’s envoys in China conducting celebrity diplomacy at all?

In our research on celebrity diplomacy in China we analyse practice, specifically what the UN’s Chinese celebrities do and in particular, how they communicate on Weibo in their capacity as informal UN diplomats. We see that, in particular, the new-generation diplomats, like actress Hai Qing and Singer Karry Wang, have become more active in UN-related activism. In contrast, old-generation ambassadors like actors Jackie Chan, Li Bingbing and Chen Kun have become less active online. We conclude that China’s changing political environment under Xi Jinping has had a greater influence on old-generation celebrities’ online presence than the growing incentive to be an advocate for the UN’s cosmopolitan values.

Symbolism and patriotism

The new generations’ activism has become more symbolic. The use of symbols to represent ideas helps avoid political entanglements and is hence less problematic in China’s party-state. It enables the Chinese celebrities simultaneously to assume the moral leadership expected of them by their domestic fandom, fulfil their obligations as informal UN ambassadors and endorse the party-state’s UN discourse. It is an unavoidable compromise in today’s China. The new celebs hence prefer to stick to slogans. They do not discuss the UN’s SDGs, let alone in a Chinese national context. They are keen to avoid anything in their online messaging that might provoke debate in China’s over 500 million active online community on Weibo. Back in 2012–13 Chen Kun, UNICEF’s goodwill ambassador to China posted on children’s living conditions in a poverty-stricken region in south-west China. After 2013, during Xi Jinping’s presidency, he has stopped mentioning said problems altogether. The available avenues for celebrity diplomacy have changed and that change is bound to stay.

UN celebrity diplomacy in authoritarian states

UN celebrity diplomacy in authoritarian states
The UN goodwill ambassadors scheme in China is running into a profoundly political online space. This case helps to shed light on the dynamics of authoritarian states’ engagement with and response to the UN goodwill ambassadorship scheme. Can the UN ambassadors in China be seen to serve the transnational goals of the UN as the sending organization as well as the national interests of the receiving country?

The UN would benefit from a better understanding of how its celebrity ambassadors’ messages unfold in China’s political reality, and indeed elsewhere. UN communication strategy should not be limited to global messaging from the centre, but should also critically examine the translation and adaptation of central messages by its goodwill ambassadors in receiving countries. After all, the UN may be dominated by liberal democracies, but it accommodates many authoritarian countries.


This blog post was previously published by Chatham House on their International Affairs blog.

Saskia Postema is a Junior Lecturer at the Institute of Security and Global Affairs, Leiden University, The Hague, and Blog & Media Editor for The Hague Journal of Diplomacy.

Jan Melissen is Editor-in-Chief of The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, Senior Fellow at Leiden University’s Institute of Security and Global Affairs, The Hague, and Professor of Diplomacy in the Department of Political Science at the University of Antwerp.

Their article, ‘UN celebrity diplomacy in China: activism symbolism and national ambition online’ was published in the May 2021 issue of International Affairs.

Read the article here.

This website uses cookies.