Contact person

Judy Veldhuijzen has a strong track record in the field of psychosocial risk factors in intensive care survivors. She has focused on long-term outcomes after surgery and particularly intensive care stay. She published multiple papers in high-ranking peer-reviewed journals on this interdisciplinary topic and successfully completed several PhD trajectories on this topic. She started her work on ICU outcomes at the UMC Utrecht and started collaborating with the Intensive Care Unit of the LUMC when she started working in Leiden which led to the development of a project team which aimed to routinely examine psychosocial risk factors in intensive care patients. To this aim, the CONTENT-ICU study is a currently ongoing study to routinely monitor patients for psychosocial outcomes at 1 year follow up.

Description of topic

Approximately 80.000 critically ill patients are admitted to an Intensive Care Unit (ICU) in the Netherlands yearly and this number is increasing, especially now in the challenging COVID19 circumstances, but also already before COVID19. Due to improved treatment techniques on the ICU the hospital survival rate of critically ill patients admitted to the ICU increases rapidly.

The progress in ICU medicine with respect to increased survival rates comes at the cost of long-lasting medical, psychological, cognitive and emotional health sequelae (e.g., ICU acquired weakness, posttraumatic stress disorder, depression, cognitive decline and dementia) as well as impaired quality of life, which patients suffer from. These syndromes have been summarized as the post intensive care syndrome (PICS) by the Society of Critical Care Medicine.

In contrast to medical outcomes, long-term psychological, cognitive and emotional health sequelae have not been extensively studied. Long-term psychosocial problems, however, seem very prevalent, impair the quality of life and pose a large burden on society in terms of health care costs. This becomes however increasingly important as the number of survivors of critical illness rises, and these survivors are of older age with multiple comorbidities.

More research is needed to establish the magnitude and extensiveness of these problems, especially focusing on psychosocial and neuropsychological problems, to identify modifiable risk, and importantly, also resilience factors such that preventive measures can be optimized and psychological treatments may be optimally targeted.

These insights will ultimately result in reducing the development of long-term negative outcomes thereby improving quality of life of patients and reducing costs for the health care system.

We aim to examine the mechanisms of recovery of patients who survive intensive care stay by using an innovative mixed-method design including self-report questionnaires combined with clinical data to identify risk and resilience factors of recovery after critical illness requiring intensive care stay with the aim to generate data that are findable, accessible, interoperable and reusable (FAIR).