Statement of Publication Ethics and Publication Malpractice
All of our journal’s research articles are subjected to peer-review, defined as obtaining advice on individual manuscripts from reviewers’ expert in the field. Our peer review process is confidential and double-blind, which means that both the reviewer and the author identities are concealed from the reviewers, and vice versa, throughout the review process. Peer reviewers will have no conflict of interest, and are encouraged to point out relevant published work which is not yet cited.
Our journal’s editors take reasonable steps to identify and prevent the publication of papers where research misconduct has occurred. In the event that the editors are made aware of any allegation of research misconduct, the editors shall deal with allegations appropriately.
Guidelines for Retracting or Correcting Articles
Our journal’s editors follow the Retraction Guidelines developed by the Committee on Publication Ethics, and available at this link: http://publicationethics.org/files/retraction%20guidelines.pdf Our journal’s editors are always be willing to publish corrections, clarifications, retractions and apologies when needed.