Joseph Finnerty
Assistant professor
- Name
- Dr. J.C. Finnerty LLM LLB
- Telephone
- 071 5272727
- j.c.finnerty@law.leidenuniv.nl
- ORCID iD
- 0000-0002-5142-153X
Joseph (Joe) Finnerty is an Assistant Professor in European Human Rights Law at the Europa Institute, Leiden University. His primary research interest is the regulation of restrictions on rights and freedoms, particularly the purposes that are permitted or prohibited. In his research, Joe focuses on states undergoing processes of autocratisation and the role of human rights law in this context. His main focus is the European Court of Human Rights, but he regularly employs comparative legal methodologies in his work, drawing parallels with other international (human rights) courts as well as domestic constitutional courts.
His work has appeared in renowned international journals such as the European Journal of International Law and the European Convention of Human Rights Law Review. He has further contributed multiple entries to The Companion to the European Convention on Human Rights.
Before joining Leiden University, Joe was a Postdoctoral Researcher at the Academy for European Human Rights Protection (University of Cologne). He defended his PhD at the Hertie School (Berlin) and holds degrees in law (and history) from the University of Glasgow (LLB and PgDip) and Ghent University (LLM). He has further held visiting positions at the European University Institute, Johannes Gutenberg-University of Mainz and the University of Strasbourg.
Assistant professor
- Faculty of Law
- Institute of Public Law
- Europees Recht
- Çalı B & Finnerty J (2026), Quality of Law. In: Kushtrim I, Zane R & Krešimir K (Eds.), The Companion to the European Convention on Human Rights: Brill | Nijhoff.
- Çalı B & Finnerty J (2026), Accessibility of Law. In: Istrefi K, Ratniece Z & Kamber K (Eds.).
- Çalı B & Finnerty J (2026), Foreseeability of Law. In: Istrefi K. Ratniece Z & Kamber K (Eds.), Companion to the European Convention on Human Rights.
- Çalı B & Finnerty J (2026), Legitimate Aim. In: Istrefi K, Ratniece Z & Kamber K (Eds.), Companion to the European Convention on Human Rights.
- Finnerty J.C. & Çalı B (2025), The travaux préparatoires and progressive treaty interpretation: Article 18 of the European Convention on Human Rights, European journal of international law 36(2): 475-499.
- Finnerty J.C. (2024), How should the European Court of Human Rights remedy violations of Article 18 ECHR?: The case for remedial realignment, European Convention on Human Rights Law Review 5(3): 380-399.
- Çalı B., Finnerty J.C., Freeman L., Koenig A., McAvoy L., McDermott Rees Y., Murray D., Sadler-Forster J., Vazquez Llorente R. & Zarmsky S. (2024), Evaluating digital open source imagery: a guide for judges and fact-finders. Swansea: TRUE project. [other].
- Finnerty J.C. (2023), When is a state’s ‘hidden agenda’ proven?: The role of the Merabishvili’s three-legged evidentiary test in the Article 18 Strasbourg case law, European Convention on Human Rights Law Review 4(4): 447-472.
- Finnerty J.C., annotation: United Nations [UN]; Human Rights Committee [CCPR] 12 March 2020, no. UN Doc CCPR/C/128/D/2367/2014. IHRL 2023 (IHRL 3990 Bryukhanov v Russian Federation, Admissibility and merits).
- Finnerty J.C. (23 November 2022), Juszczyszyn v. Poland: article 18 ECHR’s conservative contribution to the Polish rule of law crisis. Strasbourg observers. [blog entry].
- Finnerty J.C., annotation: United Nations [UN]; Committee Against Torture [CAT] 25 November 2019, no. UN Doc CAT/C/68/D/817/2017. IHRL 2022 (IHRL 3949 Aarrass v Morocco, Admissibility and merits).
- Finnerty J.C. (2 November 2021), Carter v. Russia: evidentiary solace before the European court of human rights?. Strasbourg observers. [blog entry].