Alexander Schniedermann
PhD candidate
- Name
- A. Schniedermann MA
- Telephone
- 071 5272727
- a.schniedermann@cwts.leidenuniv.nl
- ORCID iD
- null
External PhD candidate. Alexander Schniedermann works on standardization in biomedical research.
External PhD candidate. Alexander analyzes how the biomedical sciences arrive at standardized research and communication practices. He focuses on the making and dissemination of reporting guidelines for systematic reviews and tries to understand how such standards redefine the epistemic and social promises of this genre. For his dissertation, he uses expert interviews to comprehend the social processes that result in such a guideline, as well as scientometric analyses to trace their dissemination and application.
Alexander studied „History, Economics and Philosophy of Science” at the I²SoS institute, the successor of Bielefeld’s Institute of Science and Technology Studies. Beside the curriculum, he worked as a student assistant for the Bavarian State Institute for Higher Education Research and Planning (IHF). Since 2018, he is a scientific assistant at the German Centre for Higher Education Research and Science Studies, where he investigates the characteristics and functions of review articles in various scholarly disciplines.
PhD candidate
- Social & Behavioural Sciences
- CWTS
- Anonymous (2025), Analysis of Pandemic Document Types (PanDots) [Analysis of Pandemic Document Types (PanDots)] (translation: Schniedermann A. Simons A.).
- Schniedermann Alexander (2024), Who writes what? The academic age patterns of review genres in biomedicine. : International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators.
- Schniedermann Alexander Heßelmann Felicitas Stephen Dimity Leckert Max Ottaviani Matteo (12 December 2024), Will ChatGPT Get Tenure?: Front Matter. [blog entry].
- Schniedermann Alexander Blümel Clemens Simons Arno (2022), On Top of the Hierarchy: How Guidelines Shape Systematic Reviewing in Biomedicine: Routledge. 102-126.
- Schniedermann Alexander (2022), Shaping the Qualities, Values and Standards of Science. How Reporting Guidelines Improve the Transparency of Biomedical Research, Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics 7: 846822.
- Schniedermann A. (2021), A comparison of systematic reviews and guideline-based systematic reviews in medical studies, Scientometrics 126(12): 9829-9846.
- Simons A. & Schniedermann A. (2021), The neglected politics behind evidence-based policy: shedding light on instrument constituency dynamics, Policy & Politics 49(4): 513-529.
- Blumel C. & Schniedermann A. (2020), Studying review articles in scientometrics and beyond: a research agenda, Scientometrics 124(1): 711-728.