Fengan Jiang
Researcher (Guest)
- Name
- Dr. F. Jiang LLM
- Telephone
- +31 71 527 2727
- f.jiang@law.leidenuniv.nl
Richard is a PhD candidate at the Europa Institute and coaches the Leiden University team in the ELSA WTO Moot Court Competition.
More information about Fengan Jiang
Supervisors
News items
-
Why the WTO ban on China’s export duties should be ‘greened’ -
Leiden University won prize for Overall Best Written Submission at the European Regional Round of the WTO Law Moot Court -
Working paper: 'Export restrictions and policy space for sustainable development: Lessons from trends in the regulation of export restrictions (2012-2016)' -
Richard Jiang on the potential role of export duties in China’s environmental policy
-
Can Public International Law Play a Role in China - Raw Materials II?
-
Should the WTO Allow China to Impose Export Duties Designed to Combat Climate Change?
Richard is a PhD candidate at the Europa Institute and coaches the Leiden University team in the ELSA WTO Moot Court Competition.
During his research, he interned with the WTO, United Nations ESCAP and the Development Research Center of the State Council of the PRC. Moreover, he also contributed to a Stanford Law School research project about the evolution of Chinese jurisprudence as an assistant managing editor. Prior to his PhD research and Master’s degree study in Leiden, he practiced law in Shanghai.
Researcher (Guest)
- Faculteit Rechtsgeleerdheid
- Instituut voor Publiekrecht
- Europees Recht
- Jiang F. (19 February 2020), 'Greening’ the WTO Ban on China’s Export Duties : Should WTO law allow China to use export duties to protect the environment and, if so, in what manner? (Dissertatie. Institute of Public Law, Leiden Law School, Leiden University) Meijers-reeks no. MI-338. Supervisor(s) and Co-supervisor(s): Bronckers M.C.E.J., Cuyvers A.
- Jiang F. (2017), Should the WTO Allow China to Impose Export Duties Designed to Combat Climate Change?, Global Trade and Customs Journal 12(4): 132–140.
- Jiang F. & Nijland J. (1 March 2016), Different takes on protection of public interests in a market economy: Public interests at stake?. Leiden Law Blog. Leiden: Leiden Law School. [blog entry].
No relevant ancillary activities