Universiteit Leiden

nl en

Debate

Grotius Dialogue: Offences against the administration of justice and fair trial considerations before the ICC

  • Aurélie Roche-Mair
  • Kate Orlovsky, International Bar Association
Date
31 October 2017
Time
Address
Wijnhaven Building
Turfmarkt 99
2511 DP Den Haag
Room
3.60

You’re invited to a special Grotius Dialogue with Kate Orlovsky and Aurélie Roche-Mair from the International Bar Association. 


Ms. Roche Mair and Ms. Orlovsky will present their recent discussion paper on “Offences against the administration of justice and fair trial considerations before the ICC.” This paper looks among other things at the ICC’s first two major investigations for offenses against the administration of justice, in the Bemba and Ntaganda cases.

How can investigations for contempt of court be undertaken with full respect for the rights of the accused? 

What roles do the Prosecutors and Judges have in reinforcing fairness?

How can Article 70 be taken forward?

The full discussion paper can be found here:

https://www.ibanet.org/Document/Default.aspx?DocumentUid=d1566944-3cd2-4221-b6bf-7700b7b9120b

Here’s a summary:

In the latest issue of the ICC & ICL Programme’s Discussion Paper Series, the International Bar Association (IBA) looks at how the ICC implements its jurisdiction over ‘offences against the administration of justice’.

The Discussion Paper, ‘Offences against the administration of justice and fair trial considerations before the ICC’ draws on court documents and consultations with practitioners to analyse the current practices and assess how Article 70 proceedings fit in with the requirements of fairness and due process, and to provide the basis for a policy-level discussion on this important area of the ICC’s work.

New IBA Discussion Paper on ‘Offences against the administration of justice and fair trial considerations before the International Criminal Court’

Article 70 of the Rome Statute criminalises behaviour that seriously undermines ICC proceedings, including witness interference in the form of intimidation, corruption and threats. These crimes fall under the broad umbrella of acts that threaten the integrity of the Court, also referred to as ‘contempt of court’.

The Discussion Paper looks at contempt investigations and prosecutions from a comparative perspective, taking into account the practices of other tribunals. It examines the two most significant contempt investigations that have taken place at the ICC to date. In the Bemba et al case, Trial Chamber VII found Jean-Pierre Bemba Gombo, two members of his defence team and two associates guilty of corruptly influencing 14 defence witnesses and presenting false evidence to the Court in the Bemba main case. In the Ntaganda case, allegations of attempted witness interference by the accused were first made in the pre-trial period, and have continued to be raised by the Prosecution during the ongoing trial.

What are the key areas covered by the 2017 IBA Discussion Paper?

Implementing the ICC’s jurisdiction over offences against the administration of justice consistent with international standards of fairness

The ICC, along with other international criminal courts and tribunals are held to the highest standard of fairness, due to their role as international standard setters, and due to the importance of fairness for the legitimacy of the institution. The Rome Statute makes clear that the same standards of procedural fairness apply to all proceedings at the ICC, including contempt proceedings.

At the ICC, a number of Article 70 investigations have involved an accused in detention and facing trial on other charges. The IBA urges special attention to the rights of such persons, in particular as individuals in custody are in a more vulnerable position and do not benefit from the same due process protections during the investigation as they are due during a trial.

The roles of the prosecution and judges in implementing Article 70 offences

In the Discussion Paper, the IBA notes that the ICC’s framework for addressing these crimes differs in some respects from that of other international criminal tribunals. While the ICTY, ICTR, STL and SCSL have all conducted investigations and prosecutions into contempt cases, at those tribunals judges held the discretion to investigate and prosecute contempt, whereas the ICC places that discretion with the Prosecutor.

This has led to calls to amend the Rome Statute to give the mandate to judges instead of the Prosecutor. However in light of the Court’s jurisprudence that has confirmed the Prosecutor’s discretionary mandate to investigate contempt cases, and given that amending the Statute is a long and difficult process, the IBA makes a number of recommendations to ensure the current mandate is implemented fairly. These include developing clear guidelines and policies regarding conflicts of interest for OTP staff appointed on Article 70 and Article 5 cases, and ensuring that all contempt allegations are investigated thoroughly and transparently, no matter whether they are raised by the prosecution, defence, or chamber.

The IBA also underscores the important role of judges in both the pre-trial and trial chambers. Pre-trial chambers, in presiding over the prosecution’s investigation into suspected contempt, are called on to strictly limit ex parte proceedings, ensure representation for the rights of the accused where appropriate, ensure timely and complete disclosure, and protect the privacy and legal privilege of the accused in detention. The trial chamber is called on to ensure that a pre-trial chamber takes over any investigation at the earliest possible moment that contempt allegations are made, to ensure that the ‘main case’ is not unduly affected by the contempt investigation. Trial chambers can also strictly limit the use of material derived from the contempt investigation in the main case.

Taking Article 70 forward

With this Discussion Paper, the IBA seeks to prompt further examination and discussion of policy-level issues that affect the fairness of the ICC’s investigation and prosecution of Article 70 matters. As noted throughout the report, a number of the issues addressed are before the Appeals Chamber in the Bemba and Bemba et al cases, which will in time bring additional guidance on these practices.

In addition to the roles of the OTP and chambers in ensuring that the Article 70 mandate is implemented with full respect for the rights of the accused, the IBA also urges States Parties to ensure that they have domestic legislation in place to prosecute contempt, in keeping with Rome Statute requirements.

Allegations of witness interference and other offenses against the administration of justice remain a pressing concern for the Court, and must be addressed to protect the integrity of its proceedings. It is hoped that, over time, any allegations brought under Article 70 will follow a consistent and transparent set of procedures, with additional necessary safeguards for the rights of the accused.



This paper is meant to prompt further analysis on this heated and unsettled issue, not to be the final word – so come join the discussion. To register, please e-mail the Grotius Centre.

The Grotius Dialogues coordinated by Jens Iverson and Mamadou Hebie.