![](/binaries/content/gallery/ul2/portraits/campus-the-hague/andrei-poama.png/andrei-poama.png/d200x250)
Andrei Poama
Universitair docent
- Naam
- Dr. A. Poama
- Telefoon
- +31 70 800 9065
- a.poama@fgga.leidenuniv.nl
- ORCID iD
- 0000-0002-3011-5496
De onderzoeksfocus van Andrei Poama ligt op normatieve theorieën over straf, strafrechtethiek, het verband tussen de beginselen van rechtvaardigheid en het probleem van (overheids)gezag, de ethiek van het overheidsbeleid en de democratische theorie. Eén van zijn doelen is een omgeving creëren die de morele vragen die strafrechtethiek oproept vanuit een filosofische hoek verkent, maar op een manier die het perspectief van het strafrechtelijke apparaat en de praktijkbeoefenaars erbij betrekt.
Meer informatie is te vinden op de Engelse pagina.
Universitair docent
- Faculteit Governance and Global Affairs
- Instituut Bestuurskunde
- Poama A. & Tripkovic M. (2024), Collateral Legal Consequences and the Power to Punish, Journal of Applied Philosophy : 1-19.
- Poama A. & Page J. (2024), Restorative justice for wrongful convictions: A quasi-institutional approach. In: Giuseppe Maglione Ian D. Marder Brunilda Pali (red.), Restorative Justice at a Crossroads: Dilemmas of Institutionalisation. New York: Routledge.
- Poama A. & McGinnis B. (2023), Citizens with felony convictions in the jury box: a peer-judgment argument, American Journal of Political Science : .
- Duus-Otterström G. & Poama A. (2023), Are private prisons intrinsically wrong?: An analysis, Jus Cogens 6: 29-46.
- Poama A. (2023), Desert retributivism: a deweyan critique, Journal of Ethics 27: 285-303.
- Poama A. & Theuns T. (11 februari 2021), Voting in prison should be mandatory – here’s why: The Conversation. [blog].
- Vydra S., Poama A., Giest S., Ingrams A. & Klievink B. (2021), Big data ethics: a life cycle perspective, Erasmus Law Review (1): .
- Poama A. & Volacu A. (2021), Too old to vote? : A democratic analysis of age-weighted voting, European Journal of Political Theory : .
- Bauer P.C. & Poama A. (2020), Does suffering suffice? An experimental assessment of desert retributivism, PLoS ONE 15(4): e0230304.
- Poama A. (2020), Social Injustice, Disadvantaged Offenders, and the State’s Authority to Punish, Journal of Political Philosophy : .
- Poama A. (2020), Waiving Jury Deliberation: The Humility Argument [Waiving Jury Deliberation: The Humility Argument] (vertaling Poama A.), Social Theory and Practice 46(1): 181-204.
- Poama A. (2020), Staying in or moving out? Justice and the abolition of the dark ghetto, European Journal of Political Theory 19(1): 128-138.
- Poama A., Mazepus H. & Bauer P. (2019), Do Disadvantaged Offenders Deserve Blame and Punishment?
- Poama A. & Theuns T. (2019), Making offenders vote: democratic expressivism and compulsory criminal voting, American Political Science Review 113(3): 796-809.
- Poama A. (2019), Punition [Punition] (vertaling Poama A.). In: Origgi G. (red.), Passions Sociales. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
- Poama A. (2019), Sort it Out! On the Use of Lotteries for Parliament Reform, De Hofvijver 9(96): .
- Poama A. & Theuns T.J.H. (2018), Restoring Florida’s Felons Voting Rights is Less Democratic than you Think, : .
- Lever A. & Poama A. (red.) (2018), The Routledge Handbook of Ethics and Public Policy. Routledge Handbooks in Applied Ethics nr. 7. Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge.
- Poama A. & Theuns T. (14 november 2018), Restoring Florida’s felon voting rights is less democratic than you think. Le Monde diplomatique. [blog].
- Poama A. (2018), Corrective Justice as A Principle of Criminal Law: A Prolegomenon, Criminal Law and Philosophy An International Journal for Philosophy of Crime, Criminal Law and Punishment 12(4): 605-623.
- Poama A. (2018), Application or Construction? Two Types of Public Policy Ethics. In: Lever A. & Poama A. (red.), Routledge Handbook of Ethics and Public Policy nr. 7. Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge. 37-50.
- Poama A. (2017), "Pettit, Philip". In: Sellers M. & Kirste S. (red.), Springer Encyclopedia of the Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy: Springer.
- Poama A. (2017), A Distinction With a Difference: Aristotle’s Division of Particular Justice and its Practical Significance. In: Cohen de Lara Emma & Brouwer René (red.), Aristotle’s Practical Philosophy: On the Relationship Between His Ethics and Politics: Springer.
- Poama A. (2017), Multiple Juries, Epistemic Democracy and Institutional Design Conference, Montreal, May 2017. Epistemic Democracy and Institutional Design Conference 25 mei 2017 - 27 mei 2017.
- Poama A. & Bauer P. (2017), Does Suffering Suffice? An Experimental Test of Moore's Retributivism, 2nd Bi-Annual Experimental Philosophy Workshop, Osnabrück, November 2017. .
- Poama A. & Theuns T. (2017), Voting as Punishment? Penal Expressivism and Democratic Legitimacy. Mancept Workshops 2017 11 januari 2017 - 13 januari 2018.